The Realities
But practice has shown a number of flaws in this thinking, in many cases leading to disastrous consequences. For a variety of factors, both exogenous and indigenous, have resulted in dozens of failed projects, with the costs of failure landing squarely on local communities.
![]() |
| Sugar cane fields in Kwa-Zulu Natal province RSA |
Those realities make the industry ripe for speculation. Investors jump in when oil prices are high and food supply is abundant. But when oil prices moderate and food supplies are tight project IRRs turn negative.
This scenario is exacerbated in markets where local conditions are not predictable. Jatropha has been a popular crop introduced into Africa, for example [1], but experience has shown that productivity levels have not come close to expectations [2].
Attempts to achieve improved productivity generally involve building large-scale energy-crop plantations. The result has been substantial dislocations in several African countries, with forced relocation of communities and, even more harmful, displacing the subsistence agriculture that the communities depended on.
With the global recession of 2008-2011 project economics for most biofuels endeavors have soured substantially, and investors have walked away from the majority of these projects. What is left behind are displaced communities with no longer any means to feed themselves and no jobs available, and a continuing battle over land ownership and land rights.
![]() |
| Source: GEXSI |
Sources:
1. GEXSI study
2.
3.
4.
5.


No comments:
Post a Comment